Page 28 - Main Second Asbo Book1

RESTRICTED (nhco complete)

T
CJ -t I , .9, . [C ed re Rule. _00 • Rule . I

tat"menc or Steve ELSMORE...................................... L~ ·

if undc:r l Over 18 ........... .. (ii vt: I u m · •er I ') Occu Police Officer 206372 ......... .

Til.i temenl ( coru·i hng of: .. 12 . .. pag · y m I ITll to the t f m kno~ ledge and belii:f 3r,d {
make II knowU1g t~ 1 it i tendered in vid hsbk to p:-o cution 1f I hove wilfully tcd anythin, in 11
wb1 h l Jeno~ to be fal e or do not behc ct

U .i . .ll4. ...................... .
. go.a tur<!: D te:

i kif w1tn evidence w ually recorded □ supply wisn,1ss roil· 1m rear)
(
I am a police officer attached to the Anti Social Behaviour Team as part of the Community Safety Unit based at
Enfield Civic Centre.

This is a statement of hearsay evidence compiled from police records to be relied upon in regards to an
application as allowed by Section l(c) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 as amended by the Anti Social

Behaviour Act 2003 against Simon CORDELL born 21st January 1981, of 109 BURNCROFT Avenue, Enfield EN3.

I have looked at the following police databases, Police National Computer (PNC), Crime Reporting and
Information System (CRIS) and Criminal Intelligence (CRIMINI). The PNC holds information concerning arrests,
case progression and previous convictions; it also holds information about vehicle ownership. CRIS is the

database police use to record crime and document the investigation. The CRIMINT database holds intelligence
provided by Members of the Metropolitan Police Service or infonnation they have been told by members of the
public.

1 his statement aims to show supporting evidence of the Course of behaviour by Simon CORDELL I will be
providing the hearsay evidence obtained from these police indices as this information has either been witnessed

first hand by the officers themselves or passed on by independent witnesses There is an operational need to
protect the identity of some witnesses who, for example, are too frightened due :o fear of reprisal by the
Defendant to give evidence. Those witnesses who nan1es are known and were content for their identity to be

disclosed are given in the statement. In the case of the infonnation obtained from these police incidents coming
from named Members of the Police Service it is felt that it is neither practicable nor proportionate to require each
witness To be called individually to give evidence in court

19